File Browser vs Davros

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserDavros
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 301
First released20172014
ReplacesDropboxDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Davros if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Davros details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Davros better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Davros if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Davros free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Davros under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Davros with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Davros: yes.

Related comparisons