ShareDrop vs Seafile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ShareDrop
Peer-to-peer file transfer in the browser
VS
Seafile
High-performance file sync and share with block storage
| Feature | ShareDrop | Seafile |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,747 | ★ 15,077 |
| First released | 2014 | 2012 |
| Replaces | AirDrop, WeTransfer | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose ShareDrop if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.7k GitHub stars
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Frequently asked questions
Is ShareDrop or Seafile better?
Neither is universally better. Seafile has the larger community, while ShareDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ShareDrop and Seafile free and open-source?
Yes. ShareDrop is licensed under MIT and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ShareDrop and Seafile with Docker?
ShareDrop: yes. Seafile: yes.