ShareDrop vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureShareDropPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 10,747★ 43,003
First released20142026
ReplacesAirDrop, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose ShareDrop if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.7k GitHub stars
ShareDrop details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is ShareDrop or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while ShareDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ShareDrop and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. ShareDrop is licensed under MIT and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ShareDrop and Puter with Docker?

ShareDrop: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons