Gokapi vs transfer.sh
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gokapi
Lightweight self-hosted file sharing with expiring links
VS
transfer.sh
Easy file sharing from the command line
| Feature | Gokapi | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,827 | ★ 15,881 |
| First released | 2021 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Firefox Send | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Gokapi if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
Choose transfer.sh if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 15.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Gokapi or transfer.sh better?
Neither is universally better. transfer.sh has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Gokapi and transfer.sh free and open-source?
Yes. Gokapi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and transfer.sh under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gokapi and transfer.sh with Docker?
Gokapi: yes. transfer.sh: yes.