Gokapi vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGokapiPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 2,827★ 43,003
First released20212026
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose Gokapi if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
Gokapi details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Gokapi or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Gokapi is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Gokapi and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Gokapi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Gokapi and Puter with Docker?

Gokapi: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons