Cryptgeon vs paste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cryptgeon
Encrypted note and file sharing with self-destruct
VS
paste
Minimalist self-hosted pastebin written in Go
| Feature | Cryptgeon | paste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Svelte | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,497 | ★ 578 |
| First released | 2021 | 2018 |
| Replaces | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose Cryptgeon if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Cryptgeon or paste better?
Neither is universally better. Cryptgeon has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cryptgeon and paste free and open-source?
Yes. Cryptgeon is licensed under MIT and paste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cryptgeon and paste with Docker?
Cryptgeon: yes. paste: yes.