Cryptgeon vs Ghostbin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cryptgeon
Encrypted note and file sharing with self-destruct
VS
Ghostbin
Feature-rich pastebin engine behind the Ghostbin service
| Feature | Cryptgeon | Ghostbin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Svelte | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,497 | ★ 189 |
| First released | 2021 | 2014 |
| Replaces | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose Cryptgeon if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Choose Ghostbin if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Cryptgeon or Ghostbin better?
Cryptgeon is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ghostbin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cryptgeon and Ghostbin free and open-source?
Yes. Cryptgeon is licensed under MIT and Ghostbin under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cryptgeon and Ghostbin with Docker?
Cryptgeon: yes. Ghostbin: yes.