PostgreSQL Exporter vs Uptime Kuma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
PostgreSQL Exporter
Prometheus exporter for PostgreSQL server metrics
VS
Uptime Kuma
Easy self-hosted uptime monitoring tool
| Feature | PostgreSQL Exporter | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,588 | ★ 89,960 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Datadog PostgreSQL, pganalyze | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
Why pick each one
Choose PostgreSQL Exporter if…
- Battle-tested in production
- Rich default metrics
Frequently asked questions
Is PostgreSQL Exporter or Uptime Kuma better?
Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are PostgreSQL Exporter and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?
Yes. PostgreSQL Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run PostgreSQL Exporter and Uptime Kuma with Docker?
PostgreSQL Exporter: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.