Pomf vs Send
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Pomf | Send |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 922 | ★ 5,847 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Imgur | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose Pomf if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Send if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Pomf or Send better?
Neither is universally better. Send has the larger community, while Pomf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Pomf and Send free and open-source?
Yes. Pomf is licensed under MIT and Send under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pomf and Send with Docker?
Pomf: check the project docs for container support. Send: yes.