Pomf vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePomfPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 922★ 43,003
First released20152026
ReplacesWeTransfer, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose Pomf if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Pomf details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pomf or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Pomf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pomf and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Pomf is licensed under MIT and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pomf and Puter with Docker?

Pomf: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons