PluXml vs Zola
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | PluXml | Zola |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 235 | ★ 17,308 |
| First released | 2007 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Medium |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is PluXml or Zola better?
Neither is universally better. Zola has the larger community, while PluXml is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are PluXml and Zola free and open-source?
Yes. PluXml is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Zola under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run PluXml and Zola with Docker?
PluXml: yes. Zola: check the project docs for container support.