Astro vs PluXml
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Astro
Modern static site framework for content-driven sites
VS
PluXml
XML-based blog and CMS without a database
| Feature | Astro | PluXml |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 61,631 | ★ 235 |
| First released | 2021 | 2007 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Medium | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Astro or PluXml better?
Neither is universally better. Astro has the larger community, while PluXml is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Astro and PluXml free and open-source?
Yes. Astro is licensed under MIT and PluXml under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Astro and PluXml with Docker?
Astro: check the project docs for container support. PluXml: yes.