Pinnwand vs Cryptgeon

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePinnwandCryptgeon
CategoryPastebins & SnippetsPastebins & Snippets
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguagePythonSvelte
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 226★ 1,497
First released20182021
ReplacesPastebin.comPrivateBin, One-Time Secret

Why pick each one

Choose Pinnwand if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
Pinnwand details

Choose Cryptgeon if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Cryptgeon details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pinnwand or Cryptgeon better?

Neither is universally better. Cryptgeon has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Pinnwand and Cryptgeon free and open-source?

Yes. Pinnwand is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Cryptgeon under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pinnwand and Cryptgeon with Docker?

Pinnwand: yes. Cryptgeon: yes.

Related comparisons