Pingvin Share vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePingvin ShareResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,684★ 7,055
First released20222014
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendWeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Pingvin Share if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
Pingvin Share details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pingvin Share or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

Neither is universally better. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare has the larger community, while Pingvin Share is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pingvin Share and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. Pingvin Share is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pingvin Share and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

Pingvin Share: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons