Photonix vs PiGallery2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Photonix
Self-hosted photo gallery with face and location detection
VS
PiGallery2
Fast directory-based photo gallery with search and maps
| Feature | Photonix | PiGallery2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,954 | ★ 2,251 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Photos | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Photonix or PiGallery2 better?
PiGallery2 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Photonix if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Photonix and PiGallery2 free and open-source?
Yes. Photonix is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PiGallery2 under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Photonix and PiGallery2 with Docker?
Photonix: yes. PiGallery2: yes.