Perses vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePersesUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 2,338★ 89,960
First released20222021
ReplacesGrafanaPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Perses if…

  • Version-controlled dashboards
  • Truly open governance
Perses details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Perses or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Perses if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Perses and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Perses is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Perses and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Perses: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons