Monit vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMonitUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageCJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM16 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 200★ 89,960
First released20012021
ReplacesDatadogPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Monit if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Self-healing actions
Monit details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Monit or Uptime Kuma better?

Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Monit and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Monit is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Monit and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Monit: check the project docs for container support. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons