PeerTube vs Tube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236
First released20182023
ReplacesYouTube, VimeoDailymotion, Vimeo, YouTube

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Tube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Tube details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Tube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Tube is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Tube free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tube under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Tube with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Tube: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons