PeerTube vs Tube Archivist

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeTube Archivist
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 8,342
First released20182021
ReplacesYouTube, VimeoYouTube

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Tube Archivist if…

  • Great for archiving channels
  • Powerful search
Tube Archivist details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Tube Archivist better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Tube Archivist is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Tube Archivist free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tube Archivist under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Tube Archivist with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Tube Archivist: yes.

Related comparisons