PeerTube vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 29,105
First released20182025
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or SRS better?

SRS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider PeerTube if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are PeerTube and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and SRS with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons