Airsonic vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAirsonicPeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,045★ 15,236
First released20172018
ReplacesSpotifyYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose Airsonic if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
Airsonic details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Airsonic or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Airsonic is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Airsonic and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. Airsonic is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Airsonic and PeerTube with Docker?

Airsonic: yes. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons