Peer-calls vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeer-callsChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,903★ 35,596
First released20242019
ReplacesBigBlueButton, Skype, ZoomIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Peer-calls if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Peer-calls details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Peer-calls or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community, while Peer-calls is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Peer-calls and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Peer-calls is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Peer-calls and Chatwoot with Docker?

Peer-calls: check the project docs for container support. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons