Centrifugo vs Peer-calls
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
Peer-calls
Group peer to peer video calls for everyone
| Feature | Centrifugo | Peer-calls |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 1,903 |
| First released | 2015 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | BigBlueButton, Skype, Zoom |
Why pick each one
Choose Peer-calls if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or Peer-calls better?
Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community, while Peer-calls is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Centrifugo and Peer-calls free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Peer-calls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and Peer-calls with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. Peer-calls: check the project docs for container support.