Peekaping vs Vigil
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Peekaping | Vigil |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 72 · Good | 71 · Good |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,195 | ★ 1,948 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Statuspage, Pingdom |
What are Peekaping and Vigil?
Peekaping
Peekaping is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with status pages and notifications, inspired by Uptime Kuma. It supports many monitor types and aims for a fast, modern user experience.
- Multiple monitor types
- Status pages
- Notification integrations
- Modern UI
Vigil
Vigil is a microservices status page that monitors distributed infrastructure and reports outages. It can probe HTTP, TCP, and ICMP endpoints and includes a local Prober for push-based reporting.
- Status page and monitoring
- HTTP, TCP, ICMP probes
- Push reporting with Vigil Reporter
- Alerts to Slack and email
Peekaping vs Vigil: key differences
Peekaping is written in Go, while Vigil is built with Rust. Licensing differs — MIT for Peekaping versus MPL-2.0 for Vigil. Vigil is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Peekaping. Vigil is the more established project (first released 2018), while Peekaping arrived in 2024.
Why pick each one
Choose Peekaping if…
- Lightweight Go backend
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Young project
- Smaller community
Choose Vigil if…
- Very low resource use
- Combines checks and status page
Watch out for
- Configuration via TOML files
- Smaller community
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or Vigil better?
Neither is universally better. Vigil has the larger community, while Peekaping is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Peekaping and Vigil free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and Vigil under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and Vigil with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. Vigil: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Peekaping or Vigil?
Vigil has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Peekaping. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.