Peekaping vs Vigil
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
VS
Vigil
Microservices status page with built-in monitoring
| Feature | Peekaping | Vigil |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,169 | ★ 1,937 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Statuspage, Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or Vigil better?
Neither is universally better. Vigil has the larger community, while Peekaping is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Peekaping and Vigil free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and Vigil under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and Vigil with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. Vigil: yes.