Peekaping vs Uptime Kuma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Uptime Kuma
Easy self-hosted uptime monitoring tool
| Feature | Peekaping | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | ≈5-minute setup |
| Health score | 72 · Good | 100 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,195 | ★ 91,752 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
What are Peekaping and Uptime Kuma?
Peekaping
Peekaping is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with status pages and notifications, inspired by Uptime Kuma. It supports many monitor types and aims for a fast, modern user experience.
- Multiple monitor types
- Status pages
- Notification integrations
- Modern UI
Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that checks the availability of websites, services, and APIs with a clean dashboard. It targets users who want a simple, attractive status monitor. It is deployed via Docker as a single container.
- Monitors HTTP, TCP, DNS and more
- Beautiful dashboard and status pages
- 90+ notification integrations
- Single-container deployment
Peekaping vs Uptime Kuma: key differences
Peekaping is written in Go, while Uptime Kuma is built with JavaScript. Peekaping is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Uptime Kuma. Uptime Kuma is the more established project (first released 2021), while Peekaping arrived in 2024. Uptime Kuma has the considerably larger community, at 91,752 GitHub stars versus 1,195.
Why pick each one
Choose Peekaping if…
- Lightweight Go backend
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Young project
- Smaller community
Choose Uptime Kuma if…
- Very easy to use
- Great notifications
- Lightweight
Watch out for
- Single instance, no clustering
- Not for deep metrics
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or Uptime Kuma better?
Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Peekaping and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and Uptime Kuma with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Peekaping or Uptime Kuma?
Peekaping has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Uptime Kuma. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.