Peekaping vs PHP Server Monitor
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
VS
PHP Server Monitor
Simple PHP tool for monitoring servers and websites
| Feature | Peekaping | PHP Server Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,169 | ★ 2,189 |
| First released | 2024 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or PHP Server Monitor better?
Neither is universally better. PHP Server Monitor has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Peekaping and PHP Server Monitor free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and PHP Server Monitor under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and PHP Server Monitor with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. PHP Server Monitor: yes.