SHSelfHostIndex

Payload CMS vs Sulu

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
PA Payload CMS TypeScript-native headless CMS and application framework VS SU Sulu Symfony-based CMS for business and enterprise websites
FeaturePayload CMSSulu
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 44,043★ 1,347
First released20212015
ReplacesContentful, SanityAdobe Experience Manager, Sitecore

Why pick each one

Choose Payload CMS if…

  • Excellent TypeScript developer experience
  • No vendor lock-in
Payload CMS details

Choose Sulu if…

  • Great for Symfony developers
  • Solid for business sites
Sulu details

Frequently asked questions

Is Payload CMS or Sulu better?

Payload CMS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Sulu if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Payload CMS and Sulu free and open-source?

Yes. Payload CMS is licensed under MIT and Sulu under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Payload CMS and Sulu with Docker?

Payload CMS: yes. Sulu: yes.

Related comparisons