Bludit vs Payload CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bludit
Simple flat-file CMS for fast websites and blogs
VS
Payload CMS
TypeScript-native headless CMS and application framework
| Feature | Bludit | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,464 | ★ 44,043 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | Contentful, Sanity |
Why pick each one
Choose Payload CMS if…
- Excellent TypeScript developer experience
- No vendor lock-in
Frequently asked questions
Is Bludit or Payload CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Payload CMS has the larger community, while Bludit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bludit and Payload CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Bludit is licensed under MIT and Payload CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bludit and Payload CMS with Docker?
Bludit: yes. Payload CMS: yes.