Passky Server vs TeamPass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Passky Server
Simple, lightweight and open-source password manager backend
VS
TeamPass
Collaborative password manager for teams
| Feature | Passky Server | TeamPass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 243 | ★ 1,819 |
| First released | 2021 | 2010 |
| Replaces | LastPass, Bitwarden | LastPass, 1Password |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Passky Server or TeamPass better?
Neither is universally better. TeamPass has the larger community, while Passky Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Passky Server and TeamPass free and open-source?
Yes. Passky Server is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TeamPass under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Passky Server and TeamPass with Docker?
Passky Server: yes. TeamPass: yes.