Passky Server vs Rubywarden
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Passky Server
Simple, lightweight and open-source password manager backend
VS
Rubywarden
Experimental Ruby implementation of the Bitwarden API
| Feature | Passky Server | Rubywarden |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 243 | ★ 589 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | LastPass, Bitwarden | Bitwarden, 1Password |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Passky Server or Rubywarden better?
Neither is universally better. Rubywarden has the larger community, while Passky Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Passky Server and Rubywarden free and open-source?
Yes. Passky Server is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Rubywarden under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Passky Server and Rubywarden with Docker?
Passky Server: yes. Rubywarden: check the project docs for container support.