Part-DB vs Fat Free CRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Part-DB
Web-based inventory for electronic components
VS
Fat Free CRM
Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
| Feature | Part-DB | Fat Free CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,719 | ★ 3,628 |
| First released | 2017 | 2008 |
| Replaces | NetSuite | Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Part-DB if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Choose Fat Free CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Part-DB or Fat Free CRM better?
Neither is universally better. Fat Free CRM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Part-DB and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?
Yes. Part-DB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Part-DB and Fat Free CRM with Docker?
Part-DB: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.