ERPNext vs Part-DB

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureERPNextPart-DB
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score99 · Excellent85 · Excellent
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 39,476★ 1,772
First released20102017
ReplacesSAP, NetSuite, SalesforceNetSuite

What are ERPNext and Part-DB?

ERPNext

ERPNext is a comprehensive open-source ERP covering accounting, inventory, manufacturing, HR, CRM, and more. It targets small and mid-sized businesses wanting an all-in-one system. It is deployed via Docker or the Frappe bench tool.

  • Full ERP modules in one suite
  • Accounting and inventory
  • Manufacturing and HR
  • Built on the Frappe framework

Read the full ERPNext guide →

Part-DB

Part-DB is an open-source, web-based inventory management application for electronic components and parts. It tracks stock, suppliers, prices, and storage locations.

  • Component inventory tracking
  • Supplier and price history
  • Storage location hierarchy
  • Barcode and label support

ERPNext vs Part-DB: key differences

ERPNext is written in Python, while Part-DB is built with PHP. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for ERPNext versus AGPL-3.0 for Part-DB. Part-DB is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 4,096 MB for ERPNext. ERPNext is the more established project (first released 2010), while Part-DB arrived in 2017. ERPNext has the considerably larger community, at 39,476 GitHub stars versus 1,772.

Why pick each one

Choose ERPNext if…

  • Very comprehensive
  • Active community
  • Fully open source

Watch out for

  • Complex to deploy and learn
  • Resource heavy
ERPNext details

Choose Part-DB if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
Part-DB details

Frequently asked questions

Is ERPNext or Part-DB better?

Neither is universally better. ERPNext has the larger community, while Part-DB is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ERPNext and Part-DB free and open-source?

Yes. ERPNext is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Part-DB under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ERPNext and Part-DB with Docker?

ERPNext: yes. Part-DB: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, ERPNext or Part-DB?

Part-DB has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 4,096 MB for ERPNext. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons