Papercups vs qTox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePapercupsqTox
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageElixirC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,097★ 4,977
First released20202014
ReplacesIntercom, DriftSkype, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Papercups if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Elixir
Papercups details

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
qTox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Papercups or qTox better?

Neither is universally better. Papercups has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Papercups and qTox free and open-source?

Yes. Papercups is licensed under MIT and qTox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Papercups and qTox with Docker?

Papercups: yes. qTox: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons