PairDrop vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePairDropPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 11,133★ 43,003
First released20222026
ReplacesAirDrop, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose PairDrop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.1k GitHub stars
PairDrop details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is PairDrop or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while PairDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PairDrop and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. PairDrop is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PairDrop and Puter with Docker?

PairDrop: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons