paaster vs Sup3rS3cretMes5age
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
paaster
End-to-end encrypted pastebin built with the objective of simplicity
VS
Sup3rS3cretMes5age
Very simple (to deploy and to use) secret message service using
| Feature | paaster | Sup3rS3cretMes5age |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Svelte | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 558 | ★ 568 |
| First released | 2026 | 2025 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose paaster if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Svelte
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Sup3rS3cretMes5age if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is paaster or Sup3rS3cretMes5age better?
Neither is universally better. Sup3rS3cretMes5age has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are paaster and Sup3rS3cretMes5age free and open-source?
Yes. paaster is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sup3rS3cretMes5age under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run paaster and Sup3rS3cretMes5age with Docker?
paaster: yes. Sup3rS3cretMes5age: check the project docs for container support.