Orama vs OramaCore

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOramaOramaCore
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentsource, binarydocker, source
GitHub stars★ 10,519★ 258
First released20222024
ReplacesAlgolia, ElasticsearchAlgolia, Elasticsearch

Why pick each one

Choose Orama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 10.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Orama details

Choose OramaCore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
OramaCore details

Frequently asked questions

Is Orama or OramaCore better?

Orama is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OramaCore if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Orama and OramaCore free and open-source?

Yes. Orama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OramaCore under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Orama and OramaCore with Docker?

Orama: check the project docs for container support. OramaCore: yes.

Related comparisons