OpenStatus vs Peekaping
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | OpenStatus | Peekaping |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 91 · Excellent | 72 · Good |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,143 | ★ 1,195 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Checkly | Pingdom, Better Uptime |
What are OpenStatus and Peekaping?
OpenStatus
OpenStatus is an open-source synthetic monitoring and status page platform built in TypeScript. It runs latency checks against APIs and websites from multiple regions and publishes uptime and incidents to a public status page.
- Synthetic latency monitoring
- Public status pages
- Multi-region checks
- Incident tracking
Peekaping
Peekaping is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with status pages and notifications, inspired by Uptime Kuma. It supports many monitor types and aims for a fast, modern user experience.
- Multiple monitor types
- Status pages
- Notification integrations
- Modern UI
OpenStatus vs Peekaping: key differences
OpenStatus is written in TypeScript, while Peekaping is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for OpenStatus versus MIT for Peekaping. Peekaping is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for OpenStatus. OpenStatus has the considerably larger community, at 9,143 GitHub stars versus 1,195.
Why pick each one
Choose OpenStatus if…
- Modern developer-focused UX
- Latency-aware monitoring
Watch out for
- Self-host setup is involved
- Younger project
Choose Peekaping if…
- Lightweight Go backend
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Young project
- Smaller community
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenStatus or Peekaping better?
Neither is universally better. OpenStatus has the larger community, while Peekaping is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OpenStatus and Peekaping free and open-source?
Yes. OpenStatus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenStatus and Peekaping with Docker?
OpenStatus: yes. Peekaping: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, OpenStatus or Peekaping?
Peekaping has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for OpenStatus. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.