SHSelfHostIndex

OpenSign vs Stirling PDF

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
OP OpenSign Document signing software (alternative to DocuSign) VS ST Stirling PDF Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
FeatureOpenSignStirling PDF
CategoryDocument ManagementDocument Management
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 6,783★ 89,077
First released20262023
Replaces—Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf

Why pick each one

Choose OpenSign if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
OpenSign details

Choose Stirling PDF if…

  • Keeps documents private
  • Huge range of features
Stirling PDF details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenSign or Stirling PDF better?

Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenSign if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenSign and Stirling PDF free and open-source?

Yes. OpenSign is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenSign and Stirling PDF with Docker?

OpenSign: yes. Stirling PDF: yes.

Related comparisons