SHSelfHostIndex

Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi vs Typesense

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
LU Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi Full-text search server built on the Tantivy engine VS TY Typesense Open-source typo-tolerant search engine optimized for speed
FeatureLucene Note Solr-alt ToshiTypesense
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageRustC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,256★ 26,409
First released20182019
ReplacesElasticsearchAlgolia, Elasticsearch

Why pick each one

Choose Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if…

  • Lightweight search server
  • Familiar API style
Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi details

Choose Typesense if…

  • Fast and easy to operate
  • Open-source clustering
Typesense details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi or Typesense better?

Typesense is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi and Typesense free and open-source?

Yes. Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi is licensed under MIT and Typesense under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi and Typesense with Docker?

Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi: yes. Typesense: yes.

Related comparisons