SHSelfHostIndex

Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi vs Pagefind

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
LU Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi Full-text search server built on the Tantivy engine VS PA Pagefind Static-site search that runs fully in the browser
FeatureLucene Note Solr-alt ToshiPagefind
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageRustRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarysource, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,256★ 5,390
First released20182022
ReplacesElasticsearchAlgolia, Elasticsearch

Why pick each one

Choose Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if…

  • Lightweight search server
  • Familiar API style
Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi details

Choose Pagefind if…

  • Zero server cost
  • Trivial to deploy
Pagefind details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi or Pagefind better?

Pagefind is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi and Pagefind free and open-source?

Yes. Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi is licensed under MIT and Pagefind under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi and Pagefind with Docker?

Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi: yes. Pagefind: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons