OpenRA vs Ryzom Core
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game engines & frameworks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenRA
Open-source remake of classic RTS games
VS
Ryzom Core
Open-source MMORPG engine and game framework
| Feature | OpenRA | Ryzom Core |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Game Engines & Frameworks | Game Engines & Frameworks |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 17,194 | ★ 448 |
| First released | 2010 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Command & Conquer, Red Alert | World of Warcraft |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenRA or Ryzom Core better?
OpenRA is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Ryzom Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenRA and Ryzom Core free and open-source?
Yes. OpenRA is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Ryzom Core under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenRA and Ryzom Core with Docker?
OpenRA: yes. Ryzom Core: check the project docs for container support.