Open Web Calendar vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpen Web CalendarSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM50 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 330★ 87,439
First released20242014
ReplacesGoogle Agenda, Microsoft OutlookDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Open Web Calendar if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Open Web Calendar details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Open Web Calendar or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Open Web Calendar and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Open Web Calendar is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Open Web Calendar and Syncthing with Docker?

Open Web Calendar: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons