hash-calendar vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurehash-calendarSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 69★ 87,439
First released20262014
ReplacesGoogle Agenda, Microsoft OutlookDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose hash-calendar if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
hash-calendar details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is hash-calendar or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider hash-calendar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are hash-calendar and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. hash-calendar is licensed under MIT and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run hash-calendar and Syncthing with Docker?

hash-calendar: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons