Open Web Calendar vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpen Web CalendarSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 330★ 38,732
First released20242022
ReplacesGoogle Agenda, Microsoft OutlookGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Open Web Calendar if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Open Web Calendar details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is Open Web Calendar or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while Open Web Calendar is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Open Web Calendar and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. Open Web Calendar is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Open Web Calendar and Spacedrive with Docker?

Open Web Calendar: check the project docs for container support. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons