hash-calendar vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurehash-calendarSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 69★ 38,732
First released20262022
ReplacesGoogle Agenda, Microsoft OutlookGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose hash-calendar if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
hash-calendar details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is hash-calendar or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are hash-calendar and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. hash-calendar is licensed under MIT and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run hash-calendar and Spacedrive with Docker?

hash-calendar: check the project docs for container support. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons