omnom vs TagSpaces
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
omnom
Bookmarking with full-page snapshot archiving
VS
TagSpaces
Offline file organizer and bookmark manager with tags
| Feature | omnom | TagSpaces |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 70 · Good | 90 · Excellent |
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 665 | ★ 5,290 |
| First released | 2020 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io | Evernote, Raindrop.io |
What are omnom and TagSpaces?
omnom
omnom is a self-hosted bookmarking service that stores both the link and a full snapshot of the page at the time it was saved. This guarantees access to content even if the original page changes or disappears.
- Full-page snapshots
- Browser extension
- Tagging and search
- Multi-user support
TagSpaces
TagSpaces is an offline, cross-platform application for organizing files and bookmarks using tags rather than folders. It works without a database and can be self-hosted as a web edition for browser-based access.
- Tag-based organization
- Works fully offline
- No database needed
- Browser and desktop editions
omnom vs TagSpaces: key differences
Omnom is written in Go, while TagSpaces is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — MIT for omnom versus AGPL-3.0 for TagSpaces. Omnom is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for TagSpaces. TagSpaces is the more established project (first released 2014), while omnom arrived in 2020. TagSpaces has the considerably larger community, at 5,290 GitHub stars versus 665.
Why pick each one
Choose omnom if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Watch out for
- Snapshots use disk space
- Smaller community
Choose TagSpaces if…
- Strong privacy
- Cross-platform
Watch out for
- Pro features are paid
- Tagging workflow takes adjustment
Frequently asked questions
Is omnom or TagSpaces better?
TagSpaces is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider omnom if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are omnom and TagSpaces free and open-source?
Yes. omnom is licensed under MIT and TagSpaces under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run omnom and TagSpaces with Docker?
omnom: yes. TagSpaces: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, omnom or TagSpaces?
omnom has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for TagSpaces. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.