OJS vs Tina CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OJS
Software to manage scholarly journals
VS
Tina CMS
Git-backed content management with visual editing
| Feature | OJS | Tina CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,025 | ★ 13,714 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Contentful, Sanity |
Why pick each one
Choose OJS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Choose Tina CMS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is OJS or Tina CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Tina CMS has the larger community, while OJS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OJS and Tina CMS free and open-source?
Yes. OJS is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and Tina CMS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OJS and Tina CMS with Docker?
OJS: check the project docs for container support. Tina CMS: yes.