TimeOff Management vs TimeCase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
TimeOff Management
Self-hosted leave and absence tracking for companies
VS
TimeCase
Free self-hosted time tracking web application
| Feature | TimeOff Management | TimeCase |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,041 | ★ 21 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | BambooHR, Vacation Tracker | Clockify, Toggl |
Why pick each one
Choose TimeOff Management if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose TimeCase if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeOff Management or TimeCase better?
Neither is universally better. TimeOff Management has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are TimeOff Management and TimeCase free and open-source?
Yes. TimeOff Management is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and TimeCase under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeOff Management and TimeCase with Docker?
TimeOff Management: yes. TimeCase: yes.