OctoBot vs Spliit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | OctoBot | Spliit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Budgeting & Finance | Budgeting & Finance |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,296 | ★ 2,837 |
| First released | 2026 | 2023 |
| Replaces | — | Splitwise, Tricount |
Why pick each one
Choose OctoBot if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is OctoBot or Spliit better?
Neither is universally better. OctoBot has the larger community, while Spliit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OctoBot and Spliit free and open-source?
Yes. OctoBot is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Spliit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OctoBot and Spliit with Docker?
OctoBot: yes. Spliit: yes.