Actual Budget vs OctoBot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureActual BudgetOctoBot
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 28,019★ 6,296
First released20222026
ReplacesYNAB, Mint

Why pick each one

Choose Actual Budget if…

  • Snappy offline-first experience
  • Privacy-focused sync
Actual Budget details

Choose OctoBot if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
OctoBot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Actual Budget or OctoBot better?

Actual Budget is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OctoBot if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Actual Budget and OctoBot free and open-source?

Yes. Actual Budget is licensed under MIT and OctoBot under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Actual Budget and OctoBot with Docker?

Actual Budget: yes. OctoBot: yes.

Related comparisons